DARK TRIAD explained without labels: why certain bonds make us ill
- 4 days ago
- 3 min read
In psychoanalysis, what is now called Dark Triad personality is not understood merely as a set of “difficult” traits in someone, but as a way of relating in which the other is not fully experienced or perceived as a person.
Freud already described that when narcissism is excessively closed in on itself and there are no internal limits organizing care for the other, the bond ceases to be guided by consideration and begins to serve self-interest.

André Green helps us understand these cases by describing the subjective experience of a psychic void in which the other loses emotional relevance and comes to be treated as a function or a means.
Otto Kernberg observes that, in such relationships, seduction, exploitation, and disposal are common, while Christopher Bollas describes the use of the other as someone who serves to regulate emotions and sustain identity, rather than to engage in genuine exchange.
The central point is not conscious cruelty, but a profound difficulty in recognizing the other as a separate person, with feelings and limits of their own—something that makes these bonds inevitably destructive for those who become involved.
The functioning behind what is now called the Dark Triad
Although personality psychology describes the Dark Triad as the sum of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy, what can be observed beyond isolated traits is a recurring and harmful way of relating.
It is a form of relationship in which the other is not experienced as someone with their own inner life, but as a means of regulation, confirmation, or discharge. In these cases, the bond is not a space of exchange, but of use.
The other ceases to occupy a living place in the person’s emotional economy and comes to exist as a function: someone who serves to stimulate, contain, validate, or sustain a fragile identity. When this function fails, the bond loses its meaning.
Kernberg notes that this functioning often combines narcissism and aggression, followed by exploitation, devaluation, and disposal.
What does the triad consist of?
4. Pathological narcissism: the other as a disposable mirror
The other exists to sustain an image
When they no longer fulfill this function, they are devalued
Alternation between idealization and disposal
5. Machiavellianism: intelligence without relational ethics
Preserved cognitive capacity
Instrumental empathy (understanding the other in order to manipulate them)
Cold planning of the bond
The bond is a game, not a relationship
Here there is no naivety, there is calculation.
6. Psychopathy: absence of the other’s inscription as a subject
It is not constant rage, but indifference
The other is not experienced as a similar being
The suffering of others does not organize internal limits
Psychoanalytic reading: a primitive failure in the symbolization of the other.
Very close to you
Today, in Brazil, people with this type of functioning appear less as “outliers” and more diluted within certain social contexts, where this way of operating is not only tolerated, but rewarded.
They can be found more frequently:
1. In romantic relationships marked by power asymmetry
Dating apps, dynamics of rapid disposal, intense seduction followed by indifference. These environments favor:
use of the other without implication
instrumental lies
affective exploitation
2. In highly competitive corporate environments
Especially where:
performance matters more than ethics
bonds are disposable
empathy is seen as weakness
Traits of coldness, manipulation, and narcissism may be rewarded.
3. In spaces of visibility and symbolic power
Influencers, charismatic leaders, public figures:
heavy investment in image
utilitarian relationships
difficulty sustaining affective responsibility
Here, narcissism finds a stage, not a limit.
4. In contexts of domestic violence and psychological abuse
Here, the functioning ceases to be merely relational and may escalate into:
control
humiliation
intimidation
In 2024 (the most recent data reported in the 2025 Atlas), around 1,459 women were murdered for gender-related reasons in Brazil.
5. In the penal and forensic system (a minority)
Cases of psychopathy in the strict sense:
repeated crimes
absence of remorse
instrumental use of the other
They are rare, but they exist—and they do not represent the majority of abusive relationships.
The psychic effects on those who relate to someone like this
The most frequent effect is not simple sadness, but emotional disorganization. The person begins to doubt their own feelings, their judgment, and their perception of reality. Anxiety, rumination, and often a reduction in spontaneity emerge.
This does not indicate personal fragility. It indicates prolonged exposure to a relationship in which one dominates and the other submits, because there is risk involved.
An important truth
Understanding this functioning is not meant to monitor people or label relationships. It serves to interrupt one’s own psychic violence of trying to sustain bonds in which the other is not available to recognize, care, or take responsibility.
It is not about changing the other, but about withdrawing one’s desire from a field where it is used, not valued or celebrated.









Comments